AP Government Advisor Sajjala Ramakrishna Reddy has expressed irony over the court’s decision to grant regular bail to Chandrababu Naidu in the AP Skill Scam case. Sajjala asserts that attempts are being made to misconstrue the court’s verdict in their favor, sending a potentially misleading message to the world. He emphasizes that there is substantial evidence against Chandrababu in the skill scam case, pointing to officials’ statements in note files indicating fund releases based on the CM’s directives.
Questioning the dismissal of the case, Sajjala argues that with officials explicitly linking the money release to the CM’s approval, it raises doubts about the absence of wrongdoing. He stresses that the goal is to demonstrate Chandrababu’s alleged involvement in the skill scam, despite attempts to prove otherwise in court. Sajjala also highlights the existence of four additional cases against Chandrababu.
Commenting on Chandrababu’s political status, Sajjala asserts that his influence remains unchanged whether inside or outside, and accuses attempts to evade charges through technicalities or age-related reasons. The bail decision has ignited political discourse, with contrasting perspectives on the implications of the court’s ruling.